Bautista v. Los Angeles County

10 S.O.S. 6749 (Profiled in Police Magazine 12/07/10). The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department did not violate a deputy's First Amendment rights, when the agency fired him for maintaining a personal relationship with a known prostitute and heroin user, a district appellate court has ruled. Deput…

United States v. Silva-Arzeta

(10th Cir. No. 07-5140, filed 04/27/10). Tulsa police were conducting gang surveillance on an apartment complex and saw the defendant arrive and leave an apartment a couple times after a short stay. They stopped him for not wearing a seat belt and arrested him for driving without a license. While ha…

United States v. Skinner

(6th Cir. No. 09-6497, filed 08/14/12). The government used GPS data emanating from Melvin Skinner's pay-as-you-go cell phone to determine its real-time location. This information was used to establish Skinner's location as he transported drugs along public thoroughfares between Arizona and Tennesse…

United States v. Hood

10th Cir. No. 09-4156, filed 08/17/10). Drug evidence was accidentally released to the K-9 unit, but returned when they were notified it was needed for trial. There was no bad faith destruction, just a good-faith belief the case was over. The Circuit rejected Hood's argument that destruction of the …

United States v. Mann

No. 08-3041, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 1264 (7th Cir. Decided January 20, 2010). Officer exceeded scope of a search warrant allowing search and seizure of “video tapes, CD's or other digital media, computers, and the contents of said computers, tapes, or other electronic media, to search for images of wo…

United States v. Davis

290 F3d 1239 (10th Cir. 2002). Where the manifestation of resistance displayed by defendant was his insistence upon keeping the officers outside, and even the suspected victim of a disturbance was trying to prevent the officers from entering the residence, no exigent circumstances existed to justify…

United States v. Fisher

(10th Cir. No. 09-6142, filed 03/10/10). Oklahoma City police received a 911 call of shots fired. They arrived three minutes later and were flagged down by a woman who told them a black male in a gold shirt shot at her and her son. An officer approached a car in the driveway that had its brake light…

United States v. Freeman

479 F.3d 743 (10th Cir. 2007). In a parolee search case, denial of a motion to suppress evidence resulting in a plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm is reversed where: 1) the search at issue was not valid without reasonable suspicion; 2) under the totality of the circumstances, officers …

United States v. Henderson

(10th Cir. No. 09-8015, filed 02/17/2010). A Wyoming detective determined that the defendant was engaged in exchange of child pornography, but his warrant affidavit failed to disclose (1) who informed him that a computer with the relevant IP address had transferred child pornography; or (2) the meth…

Smith v. Cain

(No. 10-8145, filed 1/10/12). Petitioner Juan Smith was convicted of first-degree murder based on the testimony of a single eyewitness. During state postconviction relief proceedings, Smith obtained police files containing statements by the eyewitness contradicting his testimony. Smith argued that t…

Theisen v. City of Maple Grove

(No. 97-2565 D. Minn. 1/15/99). City required to compensate police canine handlers for time spent at home caring for police dogs. In figuring regular rate for back pay, nondiscretionary bonuses must be included, but discretionary bonuses can be excluded. In this case, longevity pay required by CBA s…

United States v. Bayles

(10th Cir. No. 01-4092/4097, filed 11/15/2002). A conviction for possessing a firearm while subject to a domestic violence protective order did not violate the Second Amendment or the Commerce Clause, and the district court abused its discretion in granting a downward departure based on purported co…

Regents of the University of Colorado v. Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, LLC

(No. 10SC344, 3/5/12). The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that the University of Colorado cannot ban concealed-carry permit holders from bringing guns onto campus. Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, a gun-rights group, filed a lawsuit against the university in 2008, claiming its concealed weapon …

Marcus v. McCollum

394 F.3d 318 (10th Cir. 2004). Officers are not state actors for the purpose of a § 1983 when they merely stand by at a private repossession to prevent a breach of the peace, but they cross the line if they affirmatively intervene to aid the repossessor, or make legal determinations based on paperw…

Maryland v. Shatzer

(No. 08-680, filed 02/24/10). In 2003, Michael Shatzer (“Shatzer”), an inmate at the Maryland Correctional Institution, invoked his Miranda rights, refusing to speak about alleged sexual child abuse without an attorney present. The investigation into Shatzer's alleged sexual child abuse was closed l…

Miller v. Alabama

(No. 10-9646, filed 06/25/12). In consolidated petitions for habeas corpus relief, where both petitioners were convicted of murder at the age of 14 and sentenced to a mandatory term of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, denial of petition is reversed and remanded where the Eighth A…

Moore v. Madigan

(7th Cir. No. 12-1269, 12-1788, filed 12/11/12). The 7th Circuit strikes a blow for self defense and strikes down the last remaining ban on concealed carry by the state of Illinois. The law allowed ownership and the right to bear on a person's own property, but not out in public. Relying largely on …

In re Boucher

No. 2:06-mj-91, 2009 WL 424718 (D. Vt. Feb. 19, 2009). the Government sought to compel a suspect to produce an unencrypted version of a drive on his laptop. Previously, the Government had reviewed portions of the encrypted drive with the suspect but was unable to reopen the drive once it was closed….

Combs v. Coyle

(6th Cir. No. 97-4369, filed 2/23/00). An accused's silence prior to receiving Miranda warnings may not be used against him in the prosecution's case-in-chief. Defendant gunned down his girlfriend and her mother, and was wounded by an off-duty officer. Another officer arrived, took shotgun from Defe…

Califano V. Goldfarb

Califano v. Goldfarb 430 U.S. 199 (1977) Califano v. Webster 430 U.S. 313 (1977)

United States Constitution According to the###”http://lawin.org/Encyclopedia-of-the-American-Constitution/” title=”Encyclopedia of the American Constitution”>Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, about its article titled 484 CALIFANO v. GOLDFARB 430 U.S. 199 (1977) CALIFANO v. WEBSTER 430 U.S. 313 (1977) These decisions illustrated the delicacy of distinguishing between “benign” gender classifications and unconstitutional ones. Goldfarb invalidated, 5_4, a social security act provision giving survivor's benefits to any
###”http://lawi.us/constitutional-law-index/”>(read more about Constitutional law entries here). Some Constitutional Law Popular Entries ###”http://lawin.org/constitutional-law-outline/”>Constitutional Law Outline ###”http://lawi.us/constitutional-law-outline/”>Constitutional Law Outline (United States) ###”http://lawin.org/Constitutional-Lawyer/”>Constitutional Lawyer ###”http://india.lawi.asia/constitutional-law/”>Constitutional Law of India ###”http://legaldictionary.lawin.org/Constitutional-Law/”>Constitutional Law Definition ###”http://lawin.org/Constitutional-Law-Cases/”>Constitutional Law Cases ###”http://lawi.us/Constitutional-Law-Cases/”>Constitutional Law Cases (United States)

Califano v. Goldfarb Details

Concurring Brennan, White, Marshall, Powell

Concurring Specially Stevens Dissenting Rehnquist, Stewart, Blackmun, Burger, C.J. Justices Concurring Justices Concurring Specially Concurring in part and Dissenting in part Justices Dissenting Citation of Califano v. Goldfarb 430 U.S. 199 (1977).

Legislation held Unconstitutional by Califano v. Goldfarb

Acts of Congress may be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in accordance with the ###”http://lawi.us/judicial-review/”>doctrine of Judicial Review. The Supreme Court, in Califano v. Goldfarb , declared that the following Act is unconstitutional in whole or in part: Act of August 28, 1950 (§ 202(f)(1)(E), 64 Stat. 485, 42 U.S.C. § 402(f)(1)(D)) Provision declaring the Unconstitutionality Social Security Act provision awarding survivor's benefits based on earnings of a deceased wife to widower only if he was receiving at least half of his support from her at the time of her death, whereas widow receives benefits regardless of dependency, held violative of equal protection element of Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause because of its impermissible sex classification.

Resources

See Also ###”http://lawi.us/judicial-paramountcy/”>Judicial Paramountcy ###”http://lawi.us/list-of-legislation-held-unconstitutional/”>List of Legislation held Unconstitutional ###”http://lawi.us/list-of-decisions-declaring-legislation-unconstitutional/”>List of Decisions Declaring Legislation Unconstitutional ###”http://lawi.us/legislation-declared-unconstitutional/”>Legislation Declared Unconstitutional ###”http://lawi.us/judicial-review-limitations/”>Judicial Review Limitations ###”http://lawi.us/judicial-review-origins/”>Judicial Review Origins ###”http://lawi.us/judicial-review-impact/”>Judicial Review Impact ###”http://lawi.us/legislation-declared-unconstitutional/”>Legislation Declared Unconstitutional ###”http://lawi.us/declaration-of-unconstitutionality/”>Declaration of Unconstitutionality ###”http://lawi.us/unconstitutional/”>Unconstitutional Further Reading Power of the Supreme Court to Declare Acts of Congress Unconstitutional: An Address Delivered Before the Joint Session of the Legislature of the State of Oklahoma Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent, by James F. Spriggs and Thomas G. Hansford (63 J. Pol. 1091, 2001)